AIToolPilot Tested, not guessed

Home / AI detectors / Reviews / Quetext

Quetext AI detector review: 100% on the first scan, a sign-up wall on the second

The free page says “No signup required for a free scan.” In this test that held for one scan only: the AI paragraph scored 100.00%, and the next attempt, with a different text, went to a sign-up page. We could not scan our other two texts.

Visit Quetext ↗ Not an affiliate link: we have no commercial relationship with Quetext and earn nothing from this click. Disclosure
Tested
Mode
Free AI Detector · guest · default settings
Runs
1 scan · 1 text
Tested by
Jamie C., from an automated browser run
On this page
  1. Who it suits
  2. Free plan facts
  3. Findings & screenshots
  4. The text
  5. Pros and cons
  6. Method & updates

Good for

One quick check of a single paragraph, with a sentence-by-sentence list, if you do not mind that it is a one-off without an account.

Main limit

One guest scan. After it, both “New Search” and a fresh scan led to sign-up, so we have no result for a humanizer rewrite or a human text.

Free plan facts↑ Contents

Account neededNot for the first scan. The second scan needed one; we entered no email and created no account
Input limitThe page says: “Free scans up to 1,000 words.” The counter reads “0 /1,000 words”. Our text was 109 words
Time to resultEffectively instant: the result page appeared as soon as we clicked “SCAN FOR AI”, with no spinner. The page itself says “<10s”
What you getA percentage, a banner (“Our detector is highly confident that the text is written by AI.”), “Total Result: 5”, and a card for each sentence
The wallOn the result page, “New Search” opened a “Signup to Continue” box with no close button. From a fresh page, “SCAN FOR AI” redirected to /signup?ref=home (“Signup to continue”). Both asked for name, email and password, or Google
What the page claims“Instant access. No signup required for a free scan.” We saw one free scan, not a repeat allowance. A different guest session or day might behave differently; we did not test that

Findings & screenshots↑ Contents

  • Text A, our AI-written education paragraph, scored 100.00%, with the banner “Our detector is highly confident that the text is written by AI.” This is the same call Copyleaks, GPTZero and ZeroGPT made on this text in our other tests, and Sapling gave 99.3%.
  • All five sentences were flagged AI in the same green underline. The page showed no per-sentence number, so the list tells you which sentences, not how strongly.
  • The left panel ran sentences together with no space after each full stop (“work.In today’s”). That is how the page displayed them; our input had the spaces.
  • The wall came right after the first result. We tried to scan text D (an Undetectable AI rewrite) and got the sign-up page, so we have no Quetext score for a rewrite or for the 1889 human passage. That is the part detectors are most useful for, and a guest cannot test it here.
Text A: “100.00%”, “Our detector is highly confident that the text is written by AI.”, “Total Result: 5”.Open original ↗
Clicking “New Search” on the result page: a “Signup to Continue” box over the 100.00% result.Open original ↗

The text↑ Contents

The one text we could scan. Copy it to check another detector.

Text A · AI-written · education109 words
Artificial intelligence has fundamentally transformed the way students approach their academic work. In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, AI-powered tools offer unprecedented opportunities to enhance learning outcomes and streamline research processes. Furthermore, these technologies enable learners to access personalized feedback, identify knowledge gaps, and develop critical thinking skills more efficiently than ever before. However, it is important to note that the integration of AI in education also presents significant challenges, including concerns about academic integrity and over-reliance on automated assistance. Ultimately, striking the right balance between leveraging AI capabilities and fostering independent thought will be crucial for educators and students alike as they navigate this new era of learning.

Pros and cons↑ Contents

Pros

  • The first scan needed no account or email
  • Instant result with a sentence list
  • Flagged the raw AI paragraph, in this one test
  • A generous stated limit of 1,000 words per scan

Cons

  • Only one guest scan before sign-up, though the page says no sign-up is needed for a free scan
  • No close button on the sign-up box
  • No per-sentence strength, just a flag
  • Could not test it on a rewrite or on human text
Visit Quetext ↗ Not an affiliate link.

Method & updates↑ Contents

On Oct 25, 2026 an automated browser opened Quetext’s free AI Detector as a guest, pasted text A and ran one scan. It then tried a second scan with text D from a fresh page and stopped at the sign-up form. We recorded the output, the limits and the walls; Jamie C. checked the records and wrote this page. Full method.

Not tested

  • Texts D and F (an AI rewrite and a human passage): the sign-up wall came before the scan
  • Whether the limit resets by day or by session
  • Anything behind an account: the paid plans, the plagiarism checker, the API and the other Quetext tools
  • Inputs near the 1,000-word limit and non-English text

Update log

  • First published, from one scan.

↑ Back to top

Open original in new tab